2012 • Nissan
Rogue
Nissan Rogue 2.5i (170 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Nissan Rogue vs 2012 Ford Escape Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Ford
Escape
Ford Escape 2.3 L (145 Hp) 2012Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Ford Escape
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan RogueSpecificationFord Escape
NissanMakeFord
RogueModelEscape
2012Model year2012
SUV, CrossoverBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan RogueSpecificationFord Escape
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
170 HPPower145 HP
237 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan RogueSpecificationFord Escape
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan RogueSpecificationFord Escape
4x4Drivetrain4x4
CVTGears5
215/70 R16; 225/60 R17; 225/55 R18Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Nissan RogueSpecificationFord Escape
4656 mmLength4480 mm
1801 mmWidth1845 mm
1684 mmHeight1730 mm
1563-1578 KgWeight1605 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Nissan Rogue and 2012 Ford Escape approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…