DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Quest vs 2008 Saturn Aura Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn Aura

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeSaturn
QuestModelAura
2004Model year2008
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3510 cc
233 HPPower227 HP
318 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/65 R16Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5184 mmLength4851 mm
1971 mmWidth1786 mm
1778 mmHeight1475 mm
—Weight1605 Kg
3150 mmWheelbase2852 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Quest and 2008 Saturn Aura approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn Aura leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…