2016 • Nissan
Pulsar
Nissan Pulsar Visia 2016 1.2 115 HPOverall Score64.25/100
2016 Nissan Pulsar vs 2016 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.2 PureTech (110 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Citroen C3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.25–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan PulsarSpecificationCitroen C3
NissanMakeCitroen
PulsarModelC3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan PulsarSpecificationCitroen C3
12,7 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
185 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1199 cc
115 HPPower110 HP
165 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan PulsarSpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan PulsarSpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
X-TronicTransmission—
16Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan PulsarSpecificationCitroen C3
4387 mmLength3941 mm
1768 mmWidth1728 mm
1520 mmHeight1538 mm
1290 kgWeight1170 Kg
385 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2466 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Nissan Pulsar and 2016 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…