2016 • Nissan
Pulsar
Nissan Pulsar Tekna 2016 1.2 115 HPOverall Score64.25/100
2016 Nissan Pulsar vs 2016 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.2 Energy TCe (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.25–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan PulsarSpecificationRenault Clio
NissanMakeRenault
PulsarModelClio
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan PulsarSpecificationRenault Clio
12,7 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
185 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
115 HPPower120 HP
165 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan PulsarSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan PulsarSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
X-TronicTransmission—
16Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan PulsarSpecificationRenault Clio
4387 mmLength4062 mm
1768 mmWidth1731 mm
1520 mmHeight1448 mm
1290 kgWeight1090-1195 Kg
385 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2589 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Nissan Pulsar and 2016 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…