DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Sm-x

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeHonda
146ModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
212 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1970 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
187 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption8,62 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,35 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/50R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4260 mmLength3935 mm
1712 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1735 mm
1350 KgWeight1370 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 146 and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Sm-x leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…