DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Prairie vs 2004 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Prairie

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
PrairieModel3
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
160 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
181 NmTorque187 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
14 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4545 mmLength4420 mm
1690 mmWidth1755 mm
1630 mmHeight1465 mm
1490 KgWeight1235 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Prairie and 2004 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Prairie leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…