2012 • Nissan
Pixo
Nissan Pixo 1.0 (68 Hp) 2012Overall Score50.25/100
2012 Nissan Pixo vs 2012 Kia Rio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Kia
Rio
Kia Rio 1.1 12V (75 Hp) 2012Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Pixo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan PixoSpecificationKia Rio
NissanMakeKia
PixoModelRio
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan PixoSpecificationKia Rio
14,0 s0–100 km/h16,1 s
155 km/hTop speed160 km/h
996 ccEngine displacement1120 cc
68 HPPower75 HP
90 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan PixoSpecificationKia Rio
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
35 ltFuel tank43 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan PixoSpecificationKia Rio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
55/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan PixoSpecificationKia Rio
3565 mmLength4045 mm
1600 mmWidth1720 mm
1470 mmHeight1455 mm
885 KgWeight1116 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Nissan Pixo and 2012 Kia Rio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Pixo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…