DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Patrol vs 2004 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Patrol

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
PatrolModelRanger
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4169 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
160 HPPower207 HP
331 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank95 lt
20 ltUrban consumption—
11 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
265/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4763 mm
1930 mmWidth1763 mm
1850 mmHeight1648 mm
2320 KgWeight1399 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Patrol and 2004 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Patrol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…