DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Abarth 595 vs 2016 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Abarth 595

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AbarthMakeRenault
595ModelScenic
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats5/7
3Doors5

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
225 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1600 cc
180 HPPower160 HP
250 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
35 ltFuel tank53 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6 EDC
205/40 R17Tyre size195/55 R20 95H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3660 mmLength4634 mm
1627 mmWidth1866 mm
1485 mmHeight1660 mm
1045 KgWeight1644/1660 Kg
2300 mmWheelbase2804 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Abarth 595 and 2016 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Abarth 595 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…