DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Pathfinder vs 2012 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeCadillac
PathfinderModelCTS
2012Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
200 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2991 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
231 HPPower211 HP
550 NmTorque246 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7Gears6
255/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4813 mmLength4829 mm
1848 mmWidth1793 mm
1846 mmHeight1440 mm
2210 KgWeight1765 Kg
2853 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Pathfinder and 2012 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…