DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan NV200 vs 2010 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan NV200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

66.25–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan NV200SpecificationAudi A3
NissanMakeAudi
NV200ModelA3
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
5/7Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

Nissan NV200SpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h12,2 s
165 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower105 HP
153 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan NV200SpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan NV200SpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14CTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan NV200SpecificationAudi A3
4400 mmLength4238 mm
1695 mmWidth1765 mm
1860 mmHeight1424 mm
1311-1358/1352-1415 KgWeight1430 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan NV200 and 2010 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan NV200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…