DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Nissan NV200 vs 2009 Ford S-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan NV200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
NV200ModelS-Max
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeMinivan
2Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
110 HPPower100 HP
153 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14CTyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4400 mmLength4768 mm
1695 mmWidth1884 mm
1860 mmHeight1658 mm
1205-1299 KgWeight—
2725 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Nissan NV200 and 2009 Ford S-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan NV200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…