2017 • Nissan
NV200
Nissan NV200 e-NV200 2017Overall Score52.25/100
2017 Nissan NV200 vs 2014 BMW i3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • BMW
i3
BMW i3 18.8 kWh (170 Hp) 2014Overall Score53/100
WINNER
BMW i3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.25–53
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan NV200SpecificationBMW i3
NissanMakeBMW
NV200Modeli3
2017Model year2014
MinivanBody typeHatchback
2/5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan NV200SpecificationBMW i3
—0–100 km/h7,2 s
123 km/hTop speed150 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
0 HPPower0 HP
254 NmTorque250 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan NV200SpecificationBMW i3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
1 CVTGears—
185/65 R15Tyre size155/70 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan NV200SpecificationBMW i3
4560 mmLength3999 mm
1755 mmWidth1775 mm
1848 mmHeight1578 mm
1405-1531 KgWeight1195 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Nissan NV200 and 2014 BMW i3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, BMW i3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableTesla Model 3 vs Nissan NV2002017 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Spark vs Nissan NV2002016 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailableTesla Model S vs Nissan NV2002016 and 2017 model years
VSImage unavailablePorsche Mission E vs Nissan NV2002018 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableBMW i3 vs Nissan NV2002014 and 2017 model yearsComments are loading…