DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Nissan Note vs 2015 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
NoteModelFigo
2015Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1196 cc
80 HPPower88 HP
110 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
ManualTransmission—
15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4100 mmLength3995 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1530 mmHeight1525 mm
1036 kgWeight—
295 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2491 mm

Additional Features

Nissan NoteDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth
Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Nissan Note and 2015 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…