2016 • Nissan
Navara
Nissan Navara Platinum 2016 2.3 dCi 190 HPOverall Score75.5/100
2016 Nissan Navara vs 2016 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 (166 Hp) 2016Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Navara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.
75.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan NavaraSpecificationFord Ranger
NissanMakeFord
NavaraModelRanger
2016Model year2016
Pick UpBody typePick-up
—Seats2
—Doors2
Performance
Nissan NavaraSpecificationFord Ranger
10,8 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2298 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
190 HPPower166 HP
450 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan NavaraSpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan NavaraSpecificationFord Ranger
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7Gears5
ATTransmission—
18Tyre size215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan NavaraSpecificationFord Ranger
5300 mmLength5277-5354 mm
1850 mmWidth1860 mm
1790 mmHeight1703 mm
1993 kgWeight1670 Kg
? ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase3220 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Nissan Navara and 2016 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…