DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Nissan Navara vs 2016 Ford Everest Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Navara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
NavaraModelEverest
2015Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5-7
4Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2991 ccEngine displacement3198 cc
231 HPPower195 HP
550 NmTorque470 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
7Gears6
255/65 R17; 255/60 R18Tyre size265/65 R17; 265/60 R18; 265/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5222 mmLength4892 mm
1848 mmWidth1860 mm
1795 mmHeight1837 mm
2110 KgWeight2343-2494 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Nissan Navara and 2016 Ford Everest approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…