DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Navara vs 2009 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Navara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
NavaraModelS80
2010Model year2009
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
195 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2991 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
231 HPPower238 HP
550 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7Gears6
255/65 R17; 255/60 R18Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5222 mmLength4851 mm
1848 mmWidth1860 mm
1795 mmHeight1490 mm
2110 KgWeight1540 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Navara and 2009 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…