2000 • Nissan
Navara
Nissan Navara 3.0 Td Double Cab 4WD (148 Hp) 2000Overall Score64.75/100
2000 Nissan Navara vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 3.0 V6 (167 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Citroen XM
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan NavaraSpecificationCitroen XM
NissanMakeCitroen
NavaraModelXM
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan NavaraSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h9,7 s
0 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement2963 cc
148 HPPower167 HP
314 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan NavaraSpecificationCitroen XM
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan NavaraSpecificationCitroen XM
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan NavaraSpecificationCitroen XM
5220 mmLength4708 mm
1850 mmWidth1794 mm
1774 mmHeight1389 mm
—Weight1470 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Navara and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…