DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Navara vs 2007 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
NavaraModelTribute
2004Model year2007
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
133 HPPower133 HP
304 NmTorque263 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5220 mmLength4557 mm
1850 mmWidth1806 mm
1774 mmHeight1784 mm
3200 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Navara and 2007 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…