DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan Navara vs 2010 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Navara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
NavaraModelXC70
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeEstate
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
190 HPPower175 HP
403 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
235/70 R16; 255/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5222 mmLength4838 mm
1848 mmWidth1861 mm
1773 mmHeight1604 mm
1815 KgWeight1742 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan Navara and 2010 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…