DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Nissan Murano vs 2017 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Murano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeToyota
MuranoModelHighlander
2014Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
249 HPPower249 HP
334 NmTorque356 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
X-Tronic CVTGears8
235/65 R18; 235/55 R20Tyre size245/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4890 mm
1885 mmWidth1925 mm
1720 mmHeight1770 mm
1790-1830 KgWeight2110 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Nissan Murano and 2017 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…