2012 • Nissan
Murano
Nissan Murano 3.5 V6 (249 Hp) 2012Overall Score73.75/100
2012 Nissan Murano vs 2011 Toyota Blade Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Toyota
Blade
Toyota Blade 3.4 24V6 (280 Hp) 2011Overall Score74.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Blade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
73.75–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan MuranoSpecificationToyota Blade
NissanMakeToyota
MuranoModelBlade
2012Model year2011
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan MuranoSpecificationToyota Blade
8,0 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
249 HPPower280 HP
334 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan MuranoSpecificationToyota Blade
PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan MuranoSpecificationToyota Blade
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
X-Tronic CVTGears6
235/65 R18; 235/55 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan MuranoSpecificationToyota Blade
4860 mmLength4220 mm
1885 mmWidth1760 mm
1720 mmHeight1515 mm
1790-1830 KgWeight1250 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Nissan Murano and 2011 Toyota Blade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…