DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Nissan Murano vs 2013 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Murano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJeep
MuranoModelCompass
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
196 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
190 HPPower163 HP
450 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
82 ltFuel tank51 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/55 R20Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4448 mm
1885 mmWidth1812 mm
1720 mmHeight1718 mm
1875 KgWeight1680 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Nissan Murano and 2013 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…