2010 • Nissan
Murano
Nissan Murano 2.5 dCi (190 Hp) 2010Overall Score68.5/100
2010 Nissan Murano vs 2010 Volvo XC70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.4 D DRIVe (175 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Murano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo XC70
NissanMakeVolvo
MuranoModelXC70
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo XC70
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
190 HPPower175 HP
450 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo XC70
DieselFuel typeDiesel
82 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo XC70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
235/65 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo XC70
4860 mmLength4838 mm
1885 mmWidth1861 mm
1720 mmHeight1604 mm
1895 KgWeight1742 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2815 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Nissan Murano and 2010 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…