DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Nissan Murano vs 2008 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Murano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
MuranoModelRanger
2008Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
190 HPPower143 HP
450 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
82 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/65 R18Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength5075 mm
1885 mmWidth1805 mm
1720 mmHeight1745 mm
1895 KgWeight—
2825 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Nissan Murano and 2008 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…