DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Nissan Murano vs 2017 Volkswagen Amarok Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Amarok

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolkswagen
MuranoModelAmarok
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h7,9-8.0 s
210 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
230 HPPower224 HP
329 NmTorque550 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears8
—Tyre size245/65 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4897 mmLength5254 mm
1915 mmWidth1954 mm
1692 mmHeight1834 mm
—Weight2243 Kg
2824 mmWheelbase3097 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Nissan Murano and 2017 Volkswagen Amarok approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Amarok leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…