1998 • Nissan
Mistral
Nissan Mistral 2.7 TDi (100 Hp) 1998Overall Score48.5/100
1998 Nissan Mistral vs 2000 Opel Campo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 2.5 DTI (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score49.5/100
WINNER
Opel Campo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
48.5–49.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan MistralSpecificationOpel Campo
NissanMakeOpel
MistralModelCampo
1998Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Nissan MistralSpecificationOpel Campo
19,0 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
145 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2663 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
221 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan MistralSpecificationOpel Campo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan MistralSpecificationOpel Campo
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/85 R15 STyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Nissan MistralSpecificationOpel Campo
4105 mmLength4980 mm
1735 mmWidth1690 mm
1805 mmHeight1710 mm
1730 KgWeight—
2450 mmWheelbase3025 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Nissan Mistral and 2000 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…