DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Micra vs 2003 Lada 2109 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLada
MicraModel2109
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h15,0 s
170 km/hTop speed156 km/h
1460 ccEngine displacement1500 cc
82 HPPower70 HP
185 NmTorque1064 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank43 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60 R15Tyre size175/70 SR13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3715 mmLength4205 mm
1660 mmWidth1650 mm
1525 mmHeight1402 mm
1025 KgWeight970 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Micra and 2003 Lada 2109 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…