DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Micra vs 2004 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeRenault
MicraModelClio
2005Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
155 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
65 HPPower65 HP
160 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3715 mmLength3773 mm
1660 mmWidth1639 mm
1525 mmHeight1417 mm
980 KgWeight1035 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Micra and 2004 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…