DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Micra vs 2004 Lada 2109 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lada 2109

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLada
MicraModel2109
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
155 km/hTop speed156 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1500 cc
65 HPPower72 HP
160 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank43 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption8 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60 R15Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3715 mmLength4006 mm
1660 mmWidth1650 mm
1525 mmHeight1402 mm
980 KgWeight945 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Micra and 2004 Lada 2109 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lada 2109 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…