DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Micra vs 1995 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

39.5–40.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
MicraModelVectra
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
146 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1527 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
57 HPPower60 HP
95 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank61 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/60R13Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3695 mmLength4432 mm
1585 mmWidth1706 mm
1430 mmHeight1400 mm
900 KgWeight—
2360 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Micra and 1995 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…