DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Nissan Micra vs 2000 Daihatsu Charade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daihatsu Charade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeDaihatsu
MicraModelCharade
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
170 km/hTop speed153 km/h
1275 ccEngine displacement1296 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
103 NmTorque98 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/60R13Tyre size155/80 R13 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3695 mmLength3780 mm
1585 mmWidth1620 mm
1430 mmHeight1390 mm
825 KgWeight830 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2395 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Nissan Micra and 2000 Daihatsu Charade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daihatsu Charade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…