DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Micra vs 2004 Lancia Musa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLancia
MicraModelMusa
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

13,9 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
167 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
80 HPPower70 HP
110 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank47 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5 Dualogic
165/70 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3715 mmLength3985 mm
1660 mmWidth1698 mm
1525 mmHeight1688 mm
970 KgWeight1200 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2508 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Micra and 2004 Lancia Musa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…