2004 • Nissan
Micra
Nissan Micra 1.2 i 16V (80 Hp) 2004Overall Score47.25/100
2004 Nissan Micra vs 2004 Fiat Panda Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Fiat
Panda
Fiat Panda 1.3 i 16V Multijet 4X4 (70 Hp) 2004Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Micra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan MicraSpecificationFiat Panda
NissanMakeFiat
MicraModelPanda
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Nissan MicraSpecificationFiat Panda
13,9 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
167 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement1251 cc
80 HPPower70 HP
110 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan MicraSpecificationFiat Panda
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank35 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan MicraSpecificationFiat Panda
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan MicraSpecificationFiat Panda
3715 mmLength3538 mm
1660 mmWidth1578 mm
1525 mmHeight1540 mm
970 KgWeight—
2430 mmWheelbase2299 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Nissan Micra and 2004 Fiat Panda approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…