DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Nissan Micra vs 2009 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4 points.

52.25–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
MicraModelFocus
2017Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement0 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
147 NmTorque0 Nm
3Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3825 mmLength—
1670 mmWidth—
1525 mmHeight—
1055 KgWeight—
2450 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Nissan Micra and 2009 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…