DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Nissan Micra vs 2011 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
MicraModelCombo
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
170 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
80 HPPower75 HP
110 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14; 175/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength4322 mm
1675 mmWidth1684 mm
1525 mmHeight1801 mm
910 KgWeight1278 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Nissan Micra and 2011 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…