DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Micra vs 2003 Perodua Kelisa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakePerodua
MicraModelKelisa
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

15,7 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
154 km/hTop speed140 km/h
998 ccEngine displacement989 cc
65 HPPower56 HP
89 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size155/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3715 mmLength3480 mm
1660 mmWidth1490 mm
1525 mmHeight1425 mm
940 KgWeight775 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Micra and 2003 Perodua Kelisa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…