DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan Micra vs 2002 Perodua Kelisa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakePerodua
MicraModelKelisa
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
150 km/hTop speed140 km/h
998 ccEngine displacement989 cc
60 HPPower56 HP
80 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank40 lt
7 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size155/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3746 mmLength3480 mm
1595 mmWidth1490 mm
1440 mmHeight1425 mm
835 KgWeight775 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan Micra and 2002 Perodua Kelisa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…