DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Maxima vs 2000 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHolden
MaximaModelFrontera
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
230 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement3165 cc
193 HPPower205 HP
255 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,1 ltUrban consumption17 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,1 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4680 mm
1770 mmWidth1785 mm
1415 mmHeight1690 mm
1468 KgWeight1785 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Maxima and 2000 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…