DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Nissan Maxima vs 1999 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Maxima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
MaximaModelCedric
2001Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
209 HPPower210 HP
265 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
14 ltUrban consumption14 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4920 mmLength4860 mm
1780 mmWidth1770 mm
1435 mmHeight1450 mm
1430 KgWeight1600 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Nissan Maxima and 1999 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Maxima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…