DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Nissan Maxima vs 1996 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Maxima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAudi
MaximaModel80
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
210 km/hTop speed218 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
190 HPPower174 HP
235 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4482 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1420 mmHeight1408 mm
1340 KgWeight1370 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Nissan Maxima and 1996 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Maxima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…