1995 • Nissan
March
Nissan March 1.3i 16V (75 Hp) 1995Overall Score46.25/100
1995 Nissan March vs 2000 Nissan March Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
March
Nissan March 1.3i 16V (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Nissan March
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan MarchSpecificationNissan March
NissanMakeNissan
MarchModelMarch
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Nissan MarchSpecificationNissan March
12,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1275 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
103 NmTorque103 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan MarchSpecificationNissan March
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan MarchSpecificationNissan March
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/60R13Tyre size165/60R13
Dimensions
Nissan MarchSpecificationNissan March
3695 mmLength3695 mm
1585 mmWidth1585 mm
1430 mmHeight1430 mm
825 KgWeight825 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Nissan March and 2000 Nissan March approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan March leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…