1986 • Nissan
Leopard
Nissan Leopard 2.0 V6 (115 Hp) 1986Overall Score62.25/100
1986 Nissan Leopard vs 1985 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1985 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.8 GTE (112 Hp) 1985Overall Score61.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Leopard
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan LeopardSpecificationAudi 80
NissanMakeAudi
LeopardModel80
1986Model year1985
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Nissan LeopardSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
180 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
115 HPPower112 HP
163 NmTorque160 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan LeopardSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
12 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan LeopardSpecificationAudi 80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Nissan LeopardSpecificationAudi 80
4695 mmLength4406 mm
1690 mmWidth1682 mm
1370 mmHeight1345 mm
1360 KgWeight980 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2538 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1986 Nissan Leopard and 1985 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Leopard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…