2000 • Nissan
Laurel
Nissan Laurel 2.0 24V (155 Hp) 2000Overall Score66.25/100
2000 Nissan Laurel vs 2000 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0 T (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Laurel
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan LaurelSpecificationVolvo S40
NissanMakeVolvo
LaurelModelS40
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan LaurelSpecificationVolvo S40
—0–100 km/h8,5 s
190 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
155 HPPower160 HP
186 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan LaurelSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan LaurelSpecificationVolvo S40
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan LaurelSpecificationVolvo S40
4765 mmLength4516 mm
1730 mmWidth1716 mm
1400 mmHeight1422 mm
1390 KgWeight1230 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2562 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Laurel and 2000 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…