DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Laurel vs 2000 Saab 9-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Laurel

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeSaab
LaurelModel9-5
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,3 s
190 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
155 HPPower185 HP
186 NmTorque263 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
13 ltUrban consumption13,4 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4810 mm
1730 mmWidth1790 mm
1400 mmHeight1450 mm
1390 KgWeight1575 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Laurel and 2000 Saab 9-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…