2000 • Nissan
Laurel
Nissan Laurel 2.0 24V (155 Hp) 2000Overall Score66.25/100
2000 Nissan Laurel vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 T (154 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Laurel
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
NissanMakeSaab
LaurelModel9-3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
—0–100 km/h8,8 s
190 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
155 HPPower154 HP
186 NmTorque219 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
13 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan LaurelSpecificationSaab 9-3
4765 mmLength4629 mm
1730 mmWidth1711 mm
1400 mmHeight1428 mm
1390 KgWeight1370 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Laurel and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…