DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Nissan King Cab vs 1995 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan King Cab

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAudi
King CabModel80
1995Model year1995
Pick-upBody typeEstate
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,1 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
2283 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
145 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption10,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4482 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1408 mm
—Weight1230 Kg
—Wheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Nissan King Cab and 1995 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan King Cab leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…