2017 • Nissan
Kicks
Nissan Kicks 1.6 (120 Hp) 2017Overall Score52.5/100
2017 Nissan Kicks vs 2017 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.6 CDTI (95 Hp) 2017Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Kicks
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
52.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan KicksSpecificationOpel Combo
NissanMakeOpel
KicksModelCombo
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan KicksSpecificationOpel Combo
11,5 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
0 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower95 HP
149 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan KicksSpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan KicksSpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
CVTGears6
205/60 R16; 205/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan KicksSpecificationOpel Combo
4295 mmLength4390 mm
1760 mmWidth1831 mm
1590 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
1116-1135 KgWeight—
2620 mmWheelbase2755 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Nissan Kicks and 2017 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Kicks leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…