2017 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke Tekna 2017 1.6 117 HPOverall Score64.25/100
2017 Nissan Juke vs 2017 Holden Barina Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Holden
Barina
Holden Barina 1.6 (116 Hp) 2017Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Holden Barina
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan JukeSpecificationHolden Barina
NissanMakeHolden
JukeModelBarina
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan JukeSpecificationHolden Barina
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
117 HPPower116 HP
158 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan JukeSpecificationHolden Barina
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank46 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan JukeSpecificationHolden Barina
4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
CVTTransmission—
15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan JukeSpecificationHolden Barina
4135 mmLength—
1767 mmWidth—
1565 mmHeight—
1205 kgWeight—
354 ltLuggage capacity—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Nissan Juke and 2017 Holden Barina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Barina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…