2017 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke Platinum 2017 1.2 115 HPOverall Score64.25/100
2017 Nissan Juke vs 2017 Skoda Fabia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI (110 Hp) 2017Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.25–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan JukeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
NissanMakeSkoda
JukeModelFabia
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan JukeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
10,8 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
178 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement999 cc
115 HPPower110 HP
190 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan JukeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan JukeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size185/60 R15 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan JukeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
4135 mmLength3992 mm
1767 mmWidth1732 mm
1565 mmHeight1467 mm
1236 kgWeight1055 Kg
354 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2470 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Nissan Juke and 2017 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…